![]() ![]() Today, even with my bloated sizes for logical volumes, looks like about 60GB is being used. To be far, this system does have a 1TB SSD inside it. ![]() Same for /tmp, which I mount with specific mount options for security reasons. ![]() dev/mapper/vg01-var01 ext4 20G 2.3G 17G 13% /varThe OS is using under 10GB and that's being generous. I know that a tight, fast, Ubuntu is possible in much less storage:įilesystem Type Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on People trying to extend the life if their old chromebook hardware basically cannot because of the bloat that Canonical has mandated across all Ubuntu desktop variants. The amount of bloat that snap/flatpak packages force into RAM is extremely high. How many GB do the snap packages (and flatpaks) use?ĢGB RAM was common for 5+ yrs in Chromebooks too. That year, it was common for chromebooks to have 16GB total storage. Try to load Ubuntu onto a Chromebook from 2015 that only has a 16GB SSD for storage and 2GB RAM. Place the HOME directory for that user in /nfs/home/. Using apt or flatpak instead solves this problem.Create a new userid. For example, the snap version of Gedit is unusable for me. As of today, there is only one that I know of: Its inflexible sandbox. I don't actually have much of a problem with snap, although I'm not blind to its problems. Linux Mint seems to be one of the most popular distributions around. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |